Tuesday, February 24, 2009

The fine line between life and death for the neuron

We tend to consider the brain of an adult to be like a complex piece of electronic equipment, in which static circuits comprised of neuronal cells, or neurons, perform calculations to enable thought and action.  After adolescence, it was previously thought that these circuits and wiring are complete and can not be further modified.  However, thanks to the burgeoning field of adult neurogenesis, it is now well accepted that new neurons can be born in the brain's subventricular zone and migrate to two distinct areas:  the hippocampus, or memory center of the brain; and the olfactory bulb, the first odor processing center in the brain.  Once they migrate to these regions, these neurons form connections with their pre-existing neighbors, presumably replacing lost neurons, or perhaps modifying existing circuits.  How does this happen?

Carlos Lois, whose lecture I recently attended at Children's Hospital, has been studying this question for some time and presented some interesting evidence in favor of the idea that new neurons integrate into existing adult circuits in much the same way that the brain develops during adolescence.  This is to say that more neurons than are actually needed are birthed and migrate to the region of interest (in his case, the olfactory bulb).  There they attempt to integrate into the existing circuitry.  Those that succeed survive and become functional; those that do not integrate well die.  On the particular topic of survival, he presented an interesting experiment.

His lab introduced one of two proteins into the subventrical zone of mice using a viral expression technique.  The first protein, called NachBac, is an excitatory ion channel that tends to polarize the voltage of the cell's membrane towards a positive potential.  The second protein was a potassium channel that has the opposite effect, making the cell's membrane potential more negative.  Interestingly, both proteins increased the apparent activity of the neuron, as assessed by the number of times it fired an action potential at rest (action potentials are the electrical impulses that transmit information along nerves and allow neurons to communicate).  Despite the increase in activity under both conditions, the cells with a more negative resting membrane potential died more than normal neurons, while those that were more skewed towards positive potentials survived more readily.  This makes the argument that the only deciding factor in the survival of new neurons is the resting membrane potential.  This likely means that spontaneous activity is not important for neuron surival, but coordinated or responsive activity is, as the neurons expressing NachBac would be more responsive to incoming signals.

This is another step along the way to understanding how we might one day be able to replace regions of the brain lost to stroke, disease, or injury.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Reworking

Hi folks, here's a quick update for you. I've received a lot of feedback on the blog, and it seems like people really don't have the time or inclination to read my titanic posts. So, I'm in the process of re-working the format to be something shorter and more to the point. I will also be including some commentary of seminars or lectures that I attend. Hopefully this will keep people interested and engaged! I'll see you soon.